PT

When Imaginable Futures launched in 2020, we began to build a vision for the future rooted in changing systems. Systems change work is hard, but it can be even harder to measure. Why? To name a few factors: the time horizon is far, contributions can be hard to trace and the signals can be challenging to interpret.

And yet, we are committed to holding ourselves accountable — as philanthropists, collaborators, changemakers and fellow learners. This is learning that is ongoing for us, and we are excited to share how we have been thinking, creating and implementing our Systems & Impact Framework so far.

Our Goals and Design Principles

We aren’t the first funders to try to measure systems change. And so, inspired by the work of many peers and close partners, we set out to design a framework for understanding impact that would help us achieve four key goals:


  1. To make visible our strategies, the actions we take aligned to those strategies and the changes we are seeing in the system.
  2. To inform strategic action by systematically collecting data to better understand what, why and how changes are occurring in the system.
  3. To hold ourselves accountable to our values, our partners, our Board and the broader community and field.
  4. To inspire broader alignment in the field by sharing meaningful insights back.

We are committed to holding ourselves accountable — as philanthropists, collaborators, changemakers and fellow learners.

To bring these goals to life, we grounded our framework in the following guiding design principles:

  • Action-oriented: Drives strategic learning and continuous adaptation, pushing us to reflect on our role in the system regularly.
  • Surfaces our thinking: Makes clear our assumptions and intentions about change, balancing both intuition and analytical thinking, while bringing to the forefront the context in which we are working
  • Authentic to IF: Ensures our values show up across the evaluation methods, is right-sized to the organization’s capacity and is aligned to our risk appetite.
  • Embraces flexibility: Invites participatory work, supports adaptation and learning practices, and recognizes we’re living and working in an unfinished story.
  • Redefines ‘traditional’ rigor: Builds on our learning practices and honors the local knowledge in each of the regions we work in.

Building The Framework

From these goals and principles, we came up with a multi-tiered Systems & Impact Framework. We continue to evolve the framework to ensure it’s meeting the mark.

Next, the rubber met the road — putting the framework to use. How could we design a data collection process that would allow us to gather meaningful data and insights that we could measure at each level of the framework? And, how could we do that with balanced flexibility and consistency that kept our commitment to our partners and design principles at the forefront? Here’s an overview of how we’re bringing the framework to life:

If you want to go even deeper, you can read more about the framework, the mindsets behind its development & our development process from the perspective of advisor and partner, Jewlya Lynn, here.

Our Centerpiece: The Conversation Guide

We decided the centerpiece of our framework would be something we called the Systems & Impact Conversation Guide - a conversation protocol that helps us both see the changes happening in the field and system and better understand our role in those changes. The design of the guide was informed by innovations led by peer funders on oral reporting. Insights from their experiences underscored the value of an intimate, spacious, and relaxed conversation as a method for data collection.

The guide starts with a singular, wide-open question about how the system is changing, with definitions and prompts to shape the dialogue. From there, we use follow-up questions to dig deeper into specific types of systemic change. The design prioritized giving space for the dialogue to emerge and the interviewer to be responsible for ensuring the questions are answered (regardless of when the answers emerge during the interview). To ensure inclusivity, we invited feedback from partners and stakeholders during the pilot phase, refining the tool to better align with their needs and experiences.

In 2024, we used the guide to host more than 60 conversations with our partners in Brazil, Kenya and the United States. The conversations were filled with rich insights, revealing common challenges, uncovering opportunities for collaboration and deepening our understanding of the systems we aim to shift.

With the large data set collected, we leveraged an AI-guided approach to evaluate and theme the data using Bridgespan’s Field Building for Equitable Systems Change Framework. We then used an internal learning practice ritual called Systems Sensing to analyze the data. This process allowed us to translate the data into actionable insights and strategic action as quickly as possible.

That is not to say Level 1 and 2 data collection fell to the wayside, but we opted to take a lighter approach to start:

  • Level 1: Holding ourselves accountable to our values, ways of being, mission, and vision through a survey to our partners through the Center for Effective Philanthropy every 2-3 years.
  • Level 2: Understand the range of ways that grantees are doing good, from direct impact on individuals all the way to system change through a story survey.
Our Key Insights & Learnings

Now, nearly 18 months into this work, here’s a summary of what we’ve learned so far — both about the process and the work of trying to understand system change in a more systematic way:

  • The framework and approach deepened our relationships with partners. In addition to gathering valuable data, the process also fostered trust and collaboration with our partners.
  • Conversations sparked deeper learning. The conversations laid the foundation for a series of reports and facilitated dialogues where we deeply explored what was happening in the different systems where we work that could inform strategies, deepen our impact and help us better support the systems-level work of our partners.
  • Piloting the process was critical. Piloting the data collection methods enabled us to get quick feedback from partners and refine the tools in real time before a wider rollout.
  • AI helped us go deep without slowing down. Using AI-supported tools allowed our small, lean team to thoughtfully and sensitively analyze significant qualitative data.
  • Balancing consistency and flexibility helped us meet the moment. While we strove for consistent processes across each of our geographies and strategies, some questions were bespoke and required individualized attention and investigation. Now, we’re asking ourselves: what is our baseline, shared practice and what can be customized to the moment?
  • Reducing the burden remains a priority. We continue to push ourselves to reduce the burden of reporting on partners, and this work is no exception. We’re continuing to streamline our reporting requirements, minimize them where possible and focus on mutually beneficial activities.

At Imaginable Futures, we are committed to transforming systems and holding ourselves accountable, and our Systems & Impact Framework has been integral to upholding that commitment. We are learning out loud as we push the boundaries of systems measurement, and we invite you to do the same by sharing your insights with us.